top of page
Search


Tarrying with the Negative: A Second Hegelian Perspective on OCD
Tarrying with the Negative: A Second Hegelian Perspective on OCD Outline of the Problem Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is marked by obsessions, intrusive images, waves of anxiety, and rituals — sometimes visible, sometimes entirely internal — that feel compulsory even when they are not truly willed. Driven by absolutist and non-negotiable core beliefs or fixed ideas — ‘I must be certain’, ‘I can never be wrong’, for instance — the condition becomes a relentless overseer,

Richard Mather


The Obstructed Dialectic: An Hegelian Perspective on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
The Obstructed Dialectic: An Hegelian Perspective on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a mental disorder characterized by inviolable beliefs, mental intrusions and repetitive behaviors that together create a cycle of fixation and doubt. What the sufferer seeks is the solid ground of certainty; yet in pursuing it he undermines that very aim. Each compulsion, meant to secure assurance, ultimately drives certainty further away. And still, there

Richard Mather


Dark Matter: Jacob Frank and Georges Bataille
Dark Matter: Jacob Frank and Georges Bataille Jacob Frank remains one of the most unsettling figures in the history of religious thought — not simply because of his antinomian theatrics or his deliberate profanations, but because his teachings articulate a vision of matter that resists both classical gnosticism and rationalist secular materialism. While the gnostic imagination traditionally casts the material world as a prison to be escaped, Frank inverts the schema: matter b

Richard Mather
![Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.webp)
![Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_454,h_341,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.webp)
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem] By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem] Available on Academia.edu: (PDF) By What Right Has Kant Done This Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique with proem

Richard Mather


Spinoza’s Hatchet and the Ethics of Objecthood
Spinoza’s Hatchet and the Ethics of Objecthood “For the only perfection and the final purpose [...] of an instrument is to duly fulfil the duties that are assigned to them. For instance, when a carpenter finds himself best served by his hatchet in the construction of a piece of work, then has his hatchet attained its end and perfection; but if he were to think, ‘This hatchet has now served me so well that I will let it rest and not require any more service of it’, just

Richard Mather


Atoms and Void
Atoms and Void There is no body without void – Epicurus I You’d have thought it endless, Lucretius— The laminar descent of atoms Falling through a void serene and mute, Each atom unhurried, alone, Descending at a constant pace, Unmoved by force, untouched by will, No dawn to break their quiet fall, No god to stir the silent dark. But then—a swerve, a subtle bend, Two atoms veer, incline, and meet, A fragile sign of nascent will, A fracture within fate’s per

Richard Mather
![Academia.edu: Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life [complete]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_382f71cf705a45e0845a270995aa8d7b~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_382f71cf705a45e0845a270995aa8d7b~mv2.webp)
![Academia.edu: Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life [complete]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_382f71cf705a45e0845a270995aa8d7b~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_454,h_341,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_382f71cf705a45e0845a270995aa8d7b~mv2.webp)
Academia.edu: Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life [complete]
Academia.edu: Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life [complete] Published on Academia.edu (DOC) Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life [complete]

Richard Mather


I See a Red Rose
I See a Red Rose “I see a red rose” shows us three things – “I” – a simple fact of consciousness Or awareness; “See” – shows the sense Of our action. And, within that act Of seeing, we have The concurrence of perceptions (Color, shape, quantity, etc.) Considered as a single thing – “A Red Rose”. “I see a red rose” – You see, There’s nothing romantic about it.

Richard Mather


Part 4 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life
Part 4 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life Published on Academia.edu (DOC) Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life - Part Four

Richard Mather


The Selfish Self
The Selfish Self I am my world – A world apart. Apart from me there is nothing. The world is mine. It arises from the uniqueness of my life. My life is the world and the world Is how things stand. And how things stand is my life – And only my life. What counts is me. I number myself: A one wrapped inside a zero. I stand alone, a single bulb Lighting the whole room, Enclosed by walls that are my sphere. I have no doors or windows. No

Richard Mather


Part 3 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life
Part 3 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life Published on Academia.edu (DOC) Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life - Part Three

Richard Mather


Part 2 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life
Part 2 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life Published on Academia.edu (DOC) Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life -Part Two

Richard Mather


Part 1 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life
Ludwig Wittgenstein Part 1 - Wittgenstein's Willing Subject: How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life Published on Academia.edu (DOC) Wittgenstein’s Willing Subject How the Happy Life Is the Only Right Life Part One

Richard Mather


What the Mirror Said
What the Mirror Said I am the image and you are the body. In the mirror we appear complete; We are whole: two as one. For a few moments I am riveted To your body and you are stuck with me. But when you go away, I am left without a trace, without a face, Without a form. I am deposed. I do not know how to create life From within my own. I am only a passing dream of yourself. I have only your absence – and the furniture in the room – to reflect on. Without you I am in

Richard Mather


A Vagabond Jew from Lithuania: A Poem on Salomon Maimon
A Vagabond Jew from Lithuania: A Poem on Salomon Maimon It took a vagabond Jew from Lithuania to strike the wick that Königsberg’s sage had hid and let go out in dark’s old age. Said the synagogue’s rude son: Let there be German with a Yiddish tongue, and from his restless mind concepts flowed like fire onto the page. With quid facti? and quid juris? as his lamps, he lit the lecture halls and shadowed nooks of Europe with flame incandescent, a

Richard Mather


There Were Two of Us This Morning
There Were Two of Us This Morning There were two of us this morning And there are two of us this evening, And we go on because love is two, Two people, the two of us inseparably so. A doubling that is not a doubling, Not a double presentation of the same, But one as supplement to the other. Neither one nor the other, but both, We are Two, one along with the other. Love is Two and this is what Oneness really means.

Richard Mather


Surfaces, Simulacra and Sight
Surfaces, Simulacra and Sight Simulacra peel Continually from the body’s Surface, each image Bearing the appearance of the Part it belongs to. A purposeful doubling, perhaps, but Afloat they hang Suspended as if unsure of Existence. Only for a Moment because then rapid they Migrate like birds frightened into flight. If no resistance is met, they enter the Stroma to strike the retina, Stirring sight. From there they Impact the mind, invoking inspiration. Not an engineer’s trav

Richard Mather


These Words Are Not My Words
Words like mosquitoes swarming / Around me, pestering

Richard Mather


Language Speaks for Itself
What is language? Where does it come from and what does it want (from us)?

Richard Mather


Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique Available now on Academia.edu: (PDF) By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique

Richard Mather
bottom of page