top of page
Search
![Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_333,h_250,fp_0.50_0.50,q_30,blur_30,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.webp)
![Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_454,h_341,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/318f3a_bd4ea4fd29744ea0afff5b553c694456~mv2.webp)
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem]
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem] By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique [with proem] Available on Academia.edu: (PDF) By What Right Has Kant Done This Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique with proem

Richard Mather


On the Point of Vanishing
On the Point of Vanishing Cogito ergo ends with a sum beyond my reckoning: Thoughts add up and multiply exponentially like numbers. I must have miscalculated. It’s what happens when you cannot count on your own mind to make sense of the world. This time I’ll square the root - 100,000 to 316 to 18 to 4 to 2 to 1.4 to 1.2 to 1.1 to 1 - and keep on subtracting 1 to 0.5 to 0.1 … I arrive at a bare fraction of a thought, a mere variable

Richard Mather


Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique
Academia.edu: By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique Available now on Academia.edu: (PDF) By What Right Has Kant Done This? Salomon Maimon's (un)Kantian Critique

Richard Mather


The Quality of a Quantum
The Quality of a Quantum I am nothing and you are nothing. but the relation between us isn’t nothing. Infinitesimally small differences establish the continuity between our discrete bodies. Intensive or extensive? Unity thought as plurality or plurality as unity? I can’t decide. (Either way we take up space and time.) We are two thought as one and one thought as two. If a complete synthesis is beyond us, remember this: In God’s infinite understanding we know just a little, an

Richard Mather
bottom of page